Mr. Transcription and Slipbox are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Slipbox: Privacy-first, bot-free AI meeting companion that captures system audio locally on Mac and Windows and turns it into transcripts, notes, and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Slipbox when consultants and researchers keeping private records of client and interview calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
Privacy-first, bot-free AI meeting companion that captures system audio locally on Mac and Windows and turns it into transcripts, notes, and summaries.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Slipbox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Slipbox |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Bot-free capture of system audio plus microphone directly on the device |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | On-device, real-time transcription with optional hybrid cloud features |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | AI summaries from customizable templates, tagged notes, and searchable records |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Automatic meeting detection across Zoom, Teams, Meet, Slack, FaceTime and more |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Bring-your-own LLM API key or local model support (e.g. Ollama) |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Speaker identification, semantic search, and Obsidian integration |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Slipbox
Choose Slipbox if you need consultants and researchers keeping private records of client and interview calls — strengths include no bot joins the call, so capture is discreet across many platforms.
Mr. Transcription
Slipbox
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Slipbox is strong for consultants and researchers keeping private records of client and interview calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Slipbox is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.