Mr. Transcription and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | On-device (local) transcription on macOS |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Speaker identification during transcription |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Mr. Transcription
Shadow
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.