Mr. Transcription and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Scriberr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Mr. Transcription
Scriberr
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.