Mr. Transcription and Orum are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Orum: AI-powered parallel and power dialer for sales teams with automatic call recording, real-time assist, AI scoring, and roleplay coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Orum when increasing live connect rates for sdr outbound calling matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
AI-powered parallel and power dialer for sales teams with automatic call recording, real-time assist, AI scoring, and roleplay coaching.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Orum is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Orum |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Power and parallel dialing with live-answer detection |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | Automatic call logging and recording with timestamps |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Real-time Assist surfacing objection and competitor responses |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | AI call scoring against proven criteria |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Scenario-based AI roleplay and coaching portals |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Power and parallel dialing with live-answer detection |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Orum
Choose Orum if you need increasing live connect rates for sdr outbound calling — strengths include parallel dialing maximizes live conversations per session.
Mr. Transcription
Orum
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Orum is strong for increasing live connect rates for sdr outbound calling. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Orum is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.