Mr. Transcription and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Notta: High-accuracy transcription with 42+ language translation They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key pointsPrivacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logsSpeaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser
58-language transcription
Standout feature
AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points
AI summaries
Team usage
Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats
File upload transcription
Integrations
Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs
AI summaries
Best for
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Mr. Transcription
+ Handles large files and a wide range of input formats including PDFs and images
+ Free daily tier lets users try transcription before subscribing
- General-purpose tool rather than a dedicated live-meeting notetaker
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Mr. Transcription or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mr. Transcription and Notta compare on price?
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mr. Transcription and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.