Mr. Transcription and noScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. noScribe: Free, open-source desktop transcriber that runs Whisper and pyannote fully locally with speaker identification and a synchronized editor. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and noScribe when researchers transcribing qualitative interviews while keeping data on their own machine matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
Free, open-source desktop transcriber that runs Whisper and pyannote fully locally with speaker identification and a synchronized editor.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); noScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | noScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Fully local transcription using Whisper via faster-whisper |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | Speaker diarization with pyannote (automatic or manual speaker counts) |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Support for around 60 languages |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Synchronized companion editor (noScribeEdit) with playback follow-along |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Batch transcription, pause detection, and experimental overlapping-speech detection |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Exports to HTML, VTT, and TXT plus a command-line interface |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
noScribe
Choose noScribe if you need researchers transcribing qualitative interviews while keeping data on their own machine — strengths include runs 100% locally to keep sensitive recordings confidential.
Mr. Transcription
noScribe
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while noScribe is strong for researchers transcribing qualitative interviews while keeping data on their own machine. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and noScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.