Modjo and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
AI call scoring and conversation analyticsAutomated CRM updates and AI agentsAutomatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Automated CRM updates and AI agents
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Native Salesforce and HubSpot integration
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Data hosted in France with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
Modjo
+ European data hosting with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II claims
+ Purpose-built for sales coaching and revenue intelligence
- Oriented to sales/revenue teams rather than general meeting notes
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is Modjo or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Modjo and Typist compare on price?
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Modjo and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.