Modjo and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Modjo | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | AI call scoring and conversation analytics | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Deal-signal detection (expansion, churn risk, competitors) | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Automated CRM updates and AI agents | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Native Salesforce and HubSpot integration | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Data hosted in France with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Modjo
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.