Modjo and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
AI call scoring and conversation analyticsAutomated CRM updates and AI agentsAutomatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture
Best for
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Pros & cons
Modjo
+ European data hosting with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II claims
+ Purpose-built for sales coaching and revenue intelligence
- Oriented to sales/revenue teams rather than general meeting notes
Tiro
+ Optimized for Korean and Japanese, a gap in many Western-built tools
+ Fast real-time transcription and translation for cross-border meetings
- Freemium model caps monthly transcription minutes on lower tiers
FAQ
Is Modjo or Tiro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Modjo and Tiro compare on price?
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Modjo and Tiro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.