Modjo and SpeechText.AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. SpeechText.AI: AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most, and SpeechText.AI when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
AI call scoring and conversation analyticsAutomated CRM updates and AI agentsAutomatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Domain-optimized models for fields like healthcare, finance and legal
Languages & capture
Native Salesforce and HubSpot integration
Interactive transcript editing and verification tools
Best-fit workflow
Data hosted in France with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II
Natural-language search inside audio recordings
Best for
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
SpeechText.AI
Choose SpeechText.AI if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements — strengths include domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology.
Pros & cons
Modjo
+ European data hosting with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II claims
+ Purpose-built for sales coaching and revenue intelligence
- Oriented to sales/revenue teams rather than general meeting notes
SpeechText.AI
+ Domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology
+ EU hosting and GDPR-aligned data residency for privacy-sensitive work
- Works from uploaded recordings rather than joining live meetings
FAQ
Is Modjo or SpeechText.AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance, while SpeechText.AI is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Modjo and SpeechText.AI compare on price?
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades and SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Modjo and SpeechText.AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.