Modjo and ownscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. ownscribe: Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most, and ownscribe when developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
AI call scoring and conversation analyticsAutomated CRM updates and AI agentsAutomatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings
Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes.
Modjo vs ownscribe: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
Local-first recording, transcription, and summarization via CLI
Local summarization with a built-in Phi-4-mini model, plus Ollama and OpenAI-compatible backends
Multiple summary templates (meeting, lecture, brief) and silence auto-stop
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Local summarization with a built-in Phi-4-mini model, plus Ollama and OpenAI-compatible backends
Best-fit workflow
Data hosted in France with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II
Natural-language search across meeting notes with the ask command
Best for
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
ownscribe
Choose ownscribe if you need developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac — strengths include runs entirely on-device with no data sent to external servers.
Pros & cons
Modjo
+ European data hosting with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II claims
+ Purpose-built for sales coaching and revenue intelligence
- Oriented to sales/revenue teams rather than general meeting notes
ownscribe
+ Runs entirely on-device with no data sent to external servers
+ MIT-licensed and scriptable, fitting developer and terminal-driven workflows
- Command-line only, with no graphical interface
FAQ
Is Modjo or ownscribe better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance, while ownscribe is strong for developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Modjo and ownscribe compare on price?
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades and ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Modjo and ownscribe?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.