Modjo and noScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Modjo: French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France. noScribe: Free, open-source desktop transcriber that runs Whisper and pyannote fully locally with speaker identification and a synchronized editor. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Modjo when sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance matters most, and noScribe when researchers transcribing qualitative interviews while keeping data on their own machine matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
French conversation- and revenue-intelligence platform that transcribes sales calls and meetings, surfaces deal signals, and coaches reps, with data hosted in France.
AI call scoring and conversation analyticsAutomated CRM updates and AI agentsAutomatic capture and transcription of calls and meetings
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); noScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Synchronized companion editor (noScribeEdit) with playback follow-along
Languages & capture
Native Salesforce and HubSpot integration
Batch transcription, pause detection, and experimental overlapping-speech detection
Best-fit workflow
Data hosted in France with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II
Exports to HTML, VTT, and TXT plus a command-line interface
Best for
Modjo
Choose Modjo if you need sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance — strengths include european data hosting with gdpr and soc 2 type ii claims.
noScribe
Choose noScribe if you need researchers transcribing qualitative interviews while keeping data on their own machine — strengths include runs 100% locally to keep sensitive recordings confidential.
Pros & cons
Modjo
+ European data hosting with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II claims
+ Purpose-built for sales coaching and revenue intelligence
- Oriented to sales/revenue teams rather than general meeting notes
noScribe
+ Runs 100% locally to keep sensitive recordings confidential
+ Free, open-source (GPL-3.0), and cross-platform
- Positioned for interviews and qualitative research rather than live meeting capture
FAQ
Is Modjo or noScribe better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Modjo is strong for sales teams analyzing and coaching on call performance, while noScribe is strong for researchers transcribing qualitative interviews while keeping data on their own machine. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Modjo and noScribe compare on price?
Modjo is a free tier with paid upgrades and noScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Modjo and noScribe?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.