M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate): Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) when generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records a meeting and emails back structured, detailed minutes | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Transcription and minutes in Danish, Norwegian, Swedish and English | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Mobile apps for iOS and Android | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Azure Whisper transcription and GPT-based summarization | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | EU data processing on Microsoft Azure servers in Sweden | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic deletion of audio and text after minutes are sent | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
Choose M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) if you need generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking — strengths include simple record-then-email-minutes workflow with no manual note-taking.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
Tana
It depends on your workflow. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is strong for generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.