M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) and PitchMonster are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate): Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing. PitchMonster: AI sales role-play training platform where reps practice cold calls, discovery, and demos against AI buyer personas and get scored feedback. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) when generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking matters most, and PitchMonster when standardizing pitches and messaging across a sales team matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing.
AI sales role-play training platform where reps practice cold calls, discovery, and demos against AI buyer personas and get scored feedback.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); PitchMonster is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) | PitchMonster |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records a meeting and emails back structured, detailed minutes | AI role-play simulations for cold calls, discovery, and demos |
| Standout feature | Transcription and minutes in Danish, Norwegian, Swedish and English | Custom buyer personas, objections, and talk tracks |
| Team usage | Mobile apps for iOS and Android | Feedback on filler words, pacing, sentiment, and speech patterns |
| Integrations | Azure Whisper transcription and GPT-based summarization | Custom scorecards aligned to a team's coaching standards |
| Languages & capture | EU data processing on Microsoft Azure servers in Sweden | Library of ready-to-use scenario templates |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic deletion of audio and text after minutes are sent | Gamification with leaderboards and challenges |
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
Choose M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) if you need generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking — strengths include simple record-then-email-minutes workflow with no manual note-taking.
PitchMonster
Choose PitchMonster if you need standardizing pitches and messaging across a sales team — strengths include safe, repeatable environment to practice before live calls.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
PitchMonster
It depends on your workflow. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is strong for generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking, while PitchMonster is strong for standardizing pitches and messaging across a sales team. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades and PitchMonster is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.