M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) and Pifini are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate): Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing. Pifini: AI-native sales enablement platform with a live call copilot and AI call scoring that evaluates sales conversations and routes reps into targeted coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) when generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking matters most, and Pifini when coaching reps and channel partners at scale with automated call scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing.
AI-native sales enablement platform with a live call copilot and AI call scoring that evaluates sales conversations and routes reps into targeted coaching.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Pifini is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) | Pifini |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records a meeting and emails back structured, detailed minutes | Live Sales Call Copilot providing real-time guidance and objection-handling prompts |
| Standout feature | Transcription and minutes in Danish, Norwegian, Swedish and English | AI call scoring that evaluates conversations against defined success criteria |
| Team usage | Mobile apps for iOS and Android | Automated routing of reps into targeted training based on detected skill gaps |
| Integrations | Azure Whisper transcription and GPT-based summarization | Integrated enterprise learning management system for enablement |
| Languages & capture | EU data processing on Microsoft Azure servers in Sweden | AI-powered sales role-play for practicing scripts and objections |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic deletion of audio and text after minutes are sent | Digital sales rooms for buyer engagement |
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
Choose M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) if you need generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking — strengths include simple record-then-email-minutes workflow with no manual note-taking.
Pifini
Choose Pifini if you need coaching reps and channel partners at scale with automated call scoring — strengths include connects call analysis directly to targeted coaching and training workflows.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
Pifini
It depends on your workflow. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is strong for generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking, while Pifini is strong for coaching reps and channel partners at scale with automated call scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades and Pifini is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.