M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate): Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) when generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Danish AI minutes app by Alia ApS that records a meeting and emails back structured minutes, with EU (Sweden) data processing.
Automatic deletion of audio and text after minutes are sentAzure Whisper transcription and GPT-based summarizationEU data processing on Microsoft Azure servers in Sweden
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records a meeting and emails back structured, detailed minutes
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Transcription and minutes in Danish, Norwegian, Swedish and English
AI summaries
Team usage
Mobile apps for iOS and Android
File upload transcription
Integrations
Azure Whisper transcription and GPT-based summarization
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
EU data processing on Microsoft Azure servers in Sweden
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Automatic deletion of audio and text after minutes are sent
AI summaries
Best for
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
Choose M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) if you need generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking — strengths include simple record-then-email-minutes workflow with no manual note-taking.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate)
+ Simple record-then-email-minutes workflow with no manual note-taking
+ Strong privacy posture: EU processing and deletion of data after delivery
- Mobile-app, recording-based workflow rather than a virtual meeting bot
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is strong for generating meeting minutes for danish and other scandinavian teams without manual note-taking, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) and Notta compare on price?
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
M(ø)deReferat (MinuteMate) vs Notta: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo