MoAI Note and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. MoAI Note: Korean AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings with speaker separation, built by Furence Corp. in Seoul. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist MoAI Note when korean enterprises documenting internal and client meetings matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Korean AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings with speaker separation, built by Furence Corp. in Seoul.
Automatic recording and transcription of meetings with Korean-language focusIntegrations with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and WebexMoAI Bot for querying meeting content via retrieval-augmented generation
MoAI Note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
MoAI Bot for querying meeting content via retrieval-augmented generation
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
Integrations with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
On-premise deployment option for enterprise security
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
MoAI Note
Choose MoAI Note if you need korean enterprises documenting internal and client meetings — strengths include strong focus on korean-language transcription and meeting documentation.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
MoAI Note
+ Strong focus on Korean-language transcription and meeting documentation
+ On-premise option suits organizations with data-residency or security needs
- Primarily oriented to the Korean market, which may limit usefulness for other regions
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is MoAI Note or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. MoAI Note is strong for korean enterprises documenting internal and client meetings, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do MoAI Note and Tana compare on price?
MoAI Note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both MoAI Note and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
MoAI Note vs Tana: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo