Minutes and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Minutes | Terret |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload | Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what | Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring |
| Team usage | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk | Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation |
| Integrations | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history | AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction | Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack |
| Best-fit workflow | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode | Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing |
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Minutes
Terret
It depends on your workflow. Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.