Minutes and Subanana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. Subanana: Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most, and Subanana when transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Minutes | Subanana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload | AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languages |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what | Strong handling of mixed Cantonese-and-English (code-switching) audio |
| Team usage | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk | Meeting transcription with automated summaries and action items |
| Integrations | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history | Real-time voice transcription with live translation |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction | Automatic speaker identification |
| Best-fit workflow | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode | Subtitle embedding and export to .srt, .docx, .csv, and .txt |
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Subanana
Choose Subanana if you need transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams — strengths include built for the hong kong market with strong cantonese and code-switching support.
Minutes
Subanana
It depends on your workflow. Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query, while Subanana is strong for transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.