Minutes and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Minutes | Skribby |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts |
| Team usage | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) |
| Integrations | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support |
| Best-fit workflow | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings |
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Minutes
Skribby
It depends on your workflow. Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.