Minutes and Note67 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-notes, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-notes workflows, shortlist Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most, and Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Minutes | Note67 |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload | Local on-device transcription using Whisper |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama |
| Team usage | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk | Captures both microphone and system audio |
| Integrations | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows |
| Best-fit workflow | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device |
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Minutes
Note67
It depends on your workflow. Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query, while Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.