Minom and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Minom: India-built AI meeting notes app that records conversations and generates speaker-aware minutes, decisions, and action items across major Indian languages. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Minom when documenting multilingual business meetings held in hindi or regional indian languages matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
India-built AI meeting notes app that records conversations and generates speaker-aware minutes, decisions, and action items across major Indian languages.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Minom is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Minom | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records in-person/conference-room conversations via microphone | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Generates speaker-aware summaries, decisions, and action items | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Transcription support for many Indian languages (Hindi, Gujarati, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Bengali, Punjabi) plus English and global languages | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Imports Microsoft Teams meeting transcripts | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Produces structured minutes of meeting (MoM) and follow-up tasks | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Android app with web dashboard (iOS listed as coming soon) | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Minom
Choose Minom if you need documenting multilingual business meetings held in hindi or regional indian languages — strengths include built specifically for multilingual indian teams and indian accents.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Minom
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Minom is strong for documenting multilingual business meetings held in hindi or regional indian languages, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Minom is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.