Mina and Zeck are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Zeck: Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Zeck when preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting.
AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notesAI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussionsAI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
AI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussions
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notes
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
AI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Smart agendas and interactive, mobile-first board updates
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Pre-vote and digital voting with a centralized automated minutes book
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Real-time commenting across board materials
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Zeck
Choose Zeck if you need preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting — strengths include purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Zeck
+ Purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes
+ Pre-vote and AI summaries shift routine items out of the live meeting
- Positioned more for startups and growth-stage boards than heavily regulated public companies
FAQ
Is Mina or Zeck better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Zeck is strong for preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Zeck compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Zeck?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.