Mina and Yating are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Yating: Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Yating when students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching.
API access for batch processing and ASRCross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome pluginLive microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Live microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Support for Mandarin, Taiwanese, English, Japanese, and Cantonese
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Speaker identification with timestamps
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Subtitle mode for accessibility
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Cross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome plugin
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Yating
Choose Yating if you need students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english — strengths include strong handling of taiwanese-accent mandarin and chinese-english code-switching.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Yating
+ Strong handling of Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Chinese-English code-switching
+ Privacy-focused with locally developed models and a no-data-selling stance
- Language strengths are centered on Taiwan-region languages rather than broad global coverage
FAQ
Is Mina or Yating better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Yating is strong for students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Yating compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Yating?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.