Mina and WhisperLiveKit are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. WhisperLiveKit: Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and WhisperLiveKit when self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | WhisperLiveKit |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Real-time streaming speech-to-text with low latency over WebSocket |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Real-time speaker diarization to distinguish multiple speakers |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | FastAPI backend with OpenAI-compatible REST API and Deepgram-compatible WebSocket protocol |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Multiple ASR backends (Whisper variants, Voxtral, Qwen3-ASR) and 200+ language support with translation |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Included customizable HTML/JavaScript web interface and Docker images (GPU and CPU) |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Voice activity detection and multi-user support on a single backend |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
WhisperLiveKit
Choose WhisperLiveKit if you need self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels — strengths include fully open source (apache 2.0) and self-hostable for private, on-premise transcription.
Mina
WhisperLiveKit
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while WhisperLiveKit is strong for self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.