Mina and VoicePen are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. VoicePen: Apple-native AI app that records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and voice memos, then turns them into summaries and rewritten notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and VoicePen when capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Apple-native AI app that records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and voice memos, then turns them into summaries and rewritten notes.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); VoicePen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | VoicePen |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Records and transcribes meetings, lectures, memos, and imported audio/video |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | AI-generated summaries plus 25+ rewrite and reformatting options |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Speaker separation and labeling within transcripts |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Chat-with-your-notes Q&A to extract takeaways and action steps |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Imports from Voice Memos, Zoom recordings, podcasts, YouTube, and files |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Multilingual transcription with offline recording and iCloud sync |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
VoicePen
Choose VoicePen if you need capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations — strengths include native across iphone, ipad, apple watch, and mac with icloud sync.
Mina
VoicePen
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while VoicePen is strong for capturing and summarizing in-person meetings and 1:1 conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and VoicePen is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.