Mina and Vexa are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Vexa: API-first, open-source meeting transcription platform that deploys bots to capture real-time, speaker-labeled transcripts for developers. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Vexa when building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
API-first, open-source meeting transcription platform that deploys bots to capture real-time, speaker-labeled transcripts for developers.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Vexa |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | API-first design with REST and WebSocket interfaces |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Real-time, speaker-diarized transcription with low latency |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Deployable bots that join meetings via URL to capture audio |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Open-source (Apache 2.0) with self-hosted or managed cloud options |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Data storage with query and export capabilities |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Supports Google Meet and Microsoft Teams (Zoom planned) |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Vexa
Choose Vexa if you need building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product — strengths include programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products.
Mina
Vexa
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Vexa is strong for building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.