Mina and Userology are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Userology: Vision-aware AI UX research agent that moderates usability and concept-testing interviews and reports task metrics and insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Userology when ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Vision-aware AI UX research agent that moderates usability and concept-testing interviews and reports task metrics and insights.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Userology is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Userology |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Vision-aware AI moderator that observes on-screen task completion |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Context-aware follow-ups with silence detection and glitch handling |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Multiple methods: voice interviews, prototype testing, live product research, diary studies |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Automated reports with transcripts, insights, and task-based metrics |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Chat-with-your-research data exploration |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Built-in panel recruitment plus User Interviews integration, 40+ languages |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Userology
Choose Userology if you need ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products — strengths include vision awareness supports usability and prototype testing, not just verbal interviews.
Mina
Userology
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Userology is strong for ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Userology is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.