Mina and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Mina
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.