Mina and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Automatic capture and transcription |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Mina
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.