Mina and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Terret |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Mina
Terret
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.