Mina and Summary AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Summary AI: Mobile-first AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings on-device and offers an AI agent that joins online calls to summarize them. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Summary AI when recording and summarizing in-person meetings or interviews from a phone matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Mobile-first AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings on-device and offers an AI agent that joins online calls to summarize them.
AI bullet-point summaries with decisions, action items, and deadlinesAI Meeting Assistant agent that joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams callsChat-with-your-meeting Q&A and keyword jump-to-moment search
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Summary AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
One-tap recording with transcripts and speaker labels
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
AI bullet-point summaries with decisions, action items, and deadlines
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
AI Meeting Assistant agent that joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Chat-with-your-meeting Q&A and keyword jump-to-moment search
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Recording and transcription across many languages with live translation
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Export to PDF and team sharing
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Summary AI
Choose Summary AI if you need recording and summarizing in-person meetings or interviews from a phone — strengths include flexible capture via both on-device recording and an agent that joins online calls.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Summary AI
+ Flexible capture via both on-device recording and an agent that joins online calls
+ Mobile-first design suits in-person meetings, interviews, and lectures
- Centered on mobile, with no dedicated Mac or Windows desktop recorder app
FAQ
Is Mina or Summary AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Summary AI is strong for recording and summarizing in-person meetings or interviews from a phone. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Summary AI compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Summary AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Summary AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.