Mina and Stenomatic are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Stenomatic: AI live translation and captioning platform that delivers real-time interpretation and translated captions for conferences, meetings, and webinars. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Stenomatic when adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
AI live translation and captioning platform that delivers real-time interpretation and translated captions for conferences, meetings, and webinars.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Stenomatic is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Stenomatic |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Real-time voice-to-voice interpretation for live events |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Translated live captions and on-screen transcription |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Support for a very large set of languages and multi-directional conversations |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | No-download attendee access via a branded web link |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Custom terminology input for specialized vocabulary |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | API, embeddable widget, and InEvent integration |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Stenomatic
Choose Stenomatic if you need adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit — strengths include attendees need no app install, just a web link.
Mina
Stenomatic
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Stenomatic is strong for adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Stenomatic is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.