Mina and spf.io are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. spf.io: AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and spf.io when captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | spf.io |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Automatic live captions and translation in 100+ languages, with translated audio in 70+ |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Projector display of up to four languages plus mobile QR/URL attendee access |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Integrations with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, YouTube, OBS, StreamYard, vMix, and Twitch |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Supervised/edited captioning and bidirectional translation modes |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Vocabulary fine-tuning, custom speech recognition, and adapted translation models |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Optional professional captioners, interpreters, and remote operators as add-ons |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
spf.io
Choose spf.io if you need captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices — strengths include very broad language coverage for both captions and translated audio.
Mina
spf.io
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while spf.io is strong for captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.