Mina and Sonnet AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Sonnet AI: Bot-free AI meeting assistant that records device audio, transcribes, and generates structured notes and action items across major conferencing apps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Sonnet AI when sales reps capturing call notes and follow-ups without a bot in the room matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Bot-free AI meeting assistant that records device audio, transcribes, and generates structured notes and action items across major conferencing apps.
Action item extraction with assignees and deadlinesAutomatic transcription with AI-generated structured notesBot-free recording that captures device audio without joining the call as a participant
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sonnet AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Bot-free recording that captures device audio without joining the call as a participant
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Automatic transcription with AI-generated structured notes
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Action item extraction with assignees and deadlines
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Template gallery for sales, recruiting, legal, medical and other meeting types
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Searchable database of past conversations
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Works across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Slack and Discord
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Sonnet AI
Choose Sonnet AI if you need sales reps capturing call notes and follow-ups without a bot in the room — strengths include no visible bot joins the meeting, which can feel less intrusive to participants.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Sonnet AI
+ No visible bot joins the meeting, which can feel less intrusive to participants
+ Works across many platforms without separate integrations
- Device-audio capture depends on the user's own machine being present and active
FAQ
Is Mina or Sonnet AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Sonnet AI is strong for sales reps capturing call notes and follow-ups without a bot in the room. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Sonnet AI compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sonnet AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Sonnet AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.