Mina and Sonix are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Sonix: Automated transcription service that converts audio and video into searchable text in many languages, with editing tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Sonix when transcribing recorded meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Automated transcription
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
In-browser transcript editor
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Multi-language support
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Translation and subtitles
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Search across transcripts
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Automated transcription
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Sonix
Choose Sonix if you need transcribing recorded meetings — strengths include accurate transcription with strong editing.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Sonix
+ Accurate transcription with strong editing
+ Wide language coverage
- Not a live meeting bot
FAQ
Is Mina or Sonix better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Sonix is strong for transcribing recorded meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Sonix compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Sonix?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.