Mina and Soniox are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Soniox: Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Soniox when transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Soniox |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Real-time and asynchronous speech-to-text APIs |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Speaker separation for multi-participant conversations |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Real-time speech translation across many language pairs |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changes |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Web and server SDKs for browser and backend integration |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Enterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Soniox
Choose Soniox if you need transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time — strengths include strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings.
Mina
Soniox
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Soniox is strong for transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.