Mina and Soniox are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Soniox: Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Soniox when transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps.
Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changesEnterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPRReal-time and asynchronous speech-to-text APIs
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Real-time and asynchronous speech-to-text APIs
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Speaker separation for multi-participant conversations
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Real-time speech translation across many language pairs
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changes
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Web and server SDKs for browser and backend integration
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Enterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Soniox
Choose Soniox if you need transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time — strengths include strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Soniox
+ Strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings
+ Low-latency real-time streaming suitable for live use
- Delivered as an API rather than a turnkey meeting product
FAQ
Is Mina or Soniox better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Soniox is strong for transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Soniox compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Soniox?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.