Mina and Sally are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Sally: German AI meeting assistant that joins calls to record, transcribe, and summarize meetings while extracting tasks and decisions. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Sally when german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
German AI meeting assistant that joins calls to record, transcribe, and summarize meetings while extracting tasks and decisions.
Mina vs Sally: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
Automatic summaries with action item and decision extraction and assignmentGDPR-compliant, EU-based data handlingIntegrations with CRM and collaboration tools (HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Asana)
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Sally is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Joins Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and Webex meetings to record and transcribe
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Strong German-language transcription including dialect handling, plus many other languages
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Automatic summaries with action item and decision extraction and assignment
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Meeting analytics such as speaker talk time
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Integrations with CRM and collaboration tools (HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Asana)
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Offline/uploaded audio file transcription for in-person meetings
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Sally
Choose Sally if you need german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items — strengths include optimized for german language and dialects, useful for german-speaking organizations.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Sally
+ Optimized for German language and dialects, useful for German-speaking organizations
+ EU-based vendor with GDPR focus and stated SOC 2 alignment
- Joining meetings via a participant invite means a bot presence is visible to attendees
FAQ
Is Mina or Sally better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Sally is strong for german-speaking teams needing accurate meeting minutes and action items. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Sally compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Sally is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Sally?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.