Mina and Runo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Runo: India-based SIM-based call management CRM with an AI call summary feature that transcribes sales calls and generates summaries, action items, sentiment, and CRM updates. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Runo when summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
India-based SIM-based call management CRM with an AI call summary feature that transcribes sales calls and generates summaries, action items, sentiment, and CRM updates.
AI call summaries capturing key points, customer intent, objections, and outcomesAutomatic CRM sync of summaries and dispositionsCall transcription that converts conversations into searchable text
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Runo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
AI call summaries capturing key points, customer intent, objections, and outcomes
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Call transcription that converts conversations into searchable text
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Sentiment scoring and call disposition tagging
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Automatic CRM sync of summaries and dispositions
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
SIM-based call management from real phone numbers
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Mobile apps (iOS and Android) plus a web dashboard
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Runo
Choose Runo if you need summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams — strengths include purpose-built for india's mobile-first, sim-based calling sales teams.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Runo
+ Purpose-built for India's mobile-first, SIM-based calling sales teams
+ Removes manual note-taking by auto-generating summaries and pushing them to CRM
- AI insights are tightly coupled to Runo's own call-management CRM rather than a standalone meeting tool
FAQ
Is Mina or Runo better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Runo is strong for summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Runo compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Runo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Runo?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.