Mina and Reduct are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Reduct: Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Reduct when capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text.
Annotation, highlighting, and clip-sharing tools for collaborationLive Capture that joins and records Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams callsRedaction tools for removing sensitive content from recordings
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Transcription of large volumes of audio and video into searchable text
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Live Capture that joins and records Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Text-based video editing by selecting and cutting transcript text
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Annotation, highlighting, and clip-sharing tools for collaboration
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Redaction tools for removing sensitive content from recordings
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Translation of transcripts
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Reduct
Choose Reduct if you need capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews — strengths include makes long recordings navigable by searching and editing transcript text.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Reduct
+ Makes long recordings navigable by searching and editing transcript text
+ Captures live calls across Zoom, Meet, and Teams from a meeting link
- Oriented toward teams handling large recording libraries rather than individual quick transcripts
FAQ
Is Mina or Reduct better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Reduct is strong for capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Reduct compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Reduct?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.