Mina and Read.ai are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Read.ai: AI for meetings that delivers transcripts, summaries, and engagement metrics across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Read.ai when team meeting notes and recaps matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
AI for meetings that delivers transcripts, summaries, and engagement metrics across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Read.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Read.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Transcripts and AI summaries |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Action items |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Meeting engagement and sentiment metrics |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Automatic recaps and highlights |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Searchable notes |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Transcripts and AI summaries |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Read.ai
Choose Read.ai if you need team meeting notes and recaps — strengths include adds meeting analytics on top of notes.
Mina
Read.ai
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Read.ai is strong for team meeting notes and recaps. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Read.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.