Mina and Rafiki are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Rafiki: AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Rafiki when automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights.
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email draftsAI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query toolCall scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Records and transcribes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and phone
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email drafts
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Call scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Deal and pipeline-level conversation analysis
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and Pipedrive
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
AI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query tool
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Rafiki
Choose Rafiki if you need automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls — strengths include combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Rafiki
+ Combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform
- Some advertised capabilities are listed as upcoming rather than fully shipped
FAQ
Is Mina or Rafiki better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Rafiki is strong for automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Rafiki compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Rafiki?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.