Mina and Pulse360 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Pulse360: Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Pulse360 when capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables.
AI note organization that keeps notes searchable and separate from the CRMAI rephrasing to improve client communicationsCRM integrations with Salesforce, Wealthbox, Redtail, Practifi, and Salentica
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Flexible meeting capture via recording, dictation, typing, or handwriting
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Meeting capture integration with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
AI note organization that keeps notes searchable and separate from the CRM
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Template builder for annual summaries, prep notes, and review documents
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
AI rephrasing to improve client communications
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
CRM integrations with Salesforce, Wealthbox, Redtail, Practifi, and Salentica
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Pulse360
Choose Pulse360 if you need capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents — strengths include combines note capture with professional client deliverable creation.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Pulse360
+ Combines note capture with professional client deliverable creation
+ Flexible input options including dictation and handwriting
- Tailored to financial advisors rather than general professional use
FAQ
Is Mina or Pulse360 better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Pulse360 is strong for capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Pulse360 compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Pulse360?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.