Mina and Polar Notes are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Polar Notes: AI note taker for students that turns lectures, audio, slides, PDFs, and videos into notes and study packs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Polar Notes when turning recorded lectures into summarized notes and flashcards matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
AI note taker for students that turns lectures, audio, slides, PDFs, and videos into notes and study packs.
Automatic audio transcription and AI-generated summarized notes with headingsExport to Google Docs and PDF with organized study setsMultilingual transcription for international students and teachers
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Polar Notes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Record or upload lectures, paste YouTube links, and import slides or PDFs
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Automatic audio transcription and AI-generated summarized notes with headings
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Study pack generation including study guides, flashcards, and quiz questions
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Export to Google Docs and PDF with organized study sets
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Offline access on iOS with notes stored locally by default
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Multilingual transcription for international students and teachers
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Polar Notes
Choose Polar Notes if you need turning recorded lectures into summarized notes and flashcards — strengths include turns multiple source types into exam-ready study material.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Polar Notes
+ Turns multiple source types into exam-ready study material
+ Offline, local-first storage on iOS for privacy
- Centered on individual study rather than professional meeting documentation
FAQ
Is Mina or Polar Notes better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Polar Notes is strong for turning recorded lectures into summarized notes and flashcards. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Polar Notes compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Polar Notes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Polar Notes?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.