Mina and Pocket are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Pocket: MagSafe-attached AI recorder that turns meetings and ideas into transcripts, summaries, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Pocket when recording in-person meetings and getting action items automatically matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Pocket is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
MagSafe-compatible wearable recorder with onboard storage
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Dual studio microphones plus a contact mic for phone calls
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
AI transcripts, summaries, action items, and mind maps
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Support for 120+ languages
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
Companion iOS app with cloud sync
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
One-press recording with multi-day battery
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Pocket
Choose Pocket if you need recording in-person meetings and getting action items automatically — strengths include low-friction, hands-free capture that attaches to your phone.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Pocket
+ Low-friction, hands-free capture that attaches to your phone
+ Produces structured summaries and action items, not just transcripts
- Requires purchasing dedicated hardware
FAQ
Is Mina or Pocket better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Pocket is strong for recording in-person meetings and getting action items automatically. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Pocket compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Pocket is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Pocket?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.