Mina and OpenTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. OpenTranscribe: Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and OpenTranscribe when teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | OpenTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | WhisperX transcription with large-v3-turbo and 100+ language support |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Automatic speaker diarization via PyAnnote v4 with overlap detection |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Full-text search and filtering powered by OpenSearch |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | AI summarization, topic extraction, and content analysis via multiple LLM providers |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Time-stamped comments for collaboration and annotation |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Auto-import from local folders, S3, and SMB shares |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
OpenTranscribe
Choose OpenTranscribe if you need teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings — strengths include fully self-hosted web app with a complete transcription-and-analysis stack.
Mina
OpenTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while OpenTranscribe is strong for teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.