Mina and OpenOats are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. OpenOats: Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and OpenOats when getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | OpenOats |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | Real-time local transcription of both sides of a conversation on Apple Silicon |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | Live retrieval of relevant talking points from your own notes during meetings |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Window hidden from screen sharing by default for privacy on calls |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Auto-saved transcripts and session logs to local files |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Works fully local via Ollama or with cloud models (OpenRouter, Voyage AI) |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | MIT-licensed, self-hostable Swift application |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
OpenOats
Choose OpenOats if you need getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls — strengths include local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private.
Mina
OpenOats
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while OpenOats is strong for getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.