Mina and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
AI summaries
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
File upload transcription
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
AI summaries
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Mina or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and Notta compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.