Mina and NoteGPT are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. NoteGPT: AI note-taker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures, podcasts and videos into organized notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and NoteGPT when summarizing uploaded zoom, meet or teams meeting recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant rolesIntegrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHubJoins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
AI note-taker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures, podcasts and videos into organized notes.
AI chat to ask questions about a transcript and extract detailsRecords, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures and podcastsSpeaker separation and labeling in transcripts
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); NoteGPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant
Records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures and podcasts
Standout feature
Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes
Works with Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams recordings
Team usage
Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups
Speaker separation and labeling in transcripts
Integrations
Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools
Support for long recordings, large files and batch uploads
Languages & capture
Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles
AI chat to ask questions about a transcript and extract details
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub
Translation across many languages for shared notes
Best for
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
NoteGPT
Choose NoteGPT if you need summarizing uploaded zoom, meet or teams meeting recordings — strengths include free meeting note-taker option with no sign-up required for basic use.
Pros & cons
Mina
+ Acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward
+ Wide range of integrations for CRM and project-tool updates
- Joins as a visible participant, so it is not a bot-free or stealth option
NoteGPT
+ Free meeting note-taker option with no sign-up required for basic use
+ Handles long meetings and bulk file processing
- Documentation indicates limited live, in-meeting transcription versus upload-based processing
FAQ
Is Mina or NoteGPT better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while NoteGPT is strong for summarizing uploaded zoom, meet or teams meeting recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Mina and NoteGPT compare on price?
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and NoteGPT is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Mina and NoteGPT?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Mina vs NoteGPT: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo