Mina and Notah are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Notah: Notah is an AI meeting notes and transcription assistant built for Arabic and bilingual Arabic-English teams across the MENA region, turning conversations into searchable transcripts, summaries, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most, and Notah when bilingual arabic-english business teams in the mena region capturing meeting notes and decisions matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Notah is an AI meeting notes and transcription assistant built for Arabic and bilingual Arabic-English teams across the MENA region, turning conversations into searchable transcripts, summaries, and action items.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notah is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mina | Notah |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant | AI transcription of meetings and voice notes for Arabic, English, and mixed Arabic-English conversations |
| Standout feature | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes | AI-generated meeting summaries with extracted action items and key decisions |
| Team usage | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups | Searchable transcripts and meeting archive |
| Integrations | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools | Mind map visualization of meeting content |
| Languages & capture | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles | Chrome extension plus web app for desktop and mobile browsers |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub | Integrations with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, and the Beem platform |
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Notah
Choose Notah if you need bilingual arabic-english business teams in the mena region capturing meeting notes and decisions — strengths include purpose-built for arabic dialects and arabic-english code-switching, a gap in many global tools.
Mina
Notah
It depends on your workflow. Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls, while Notah is strong for bilingual arabic-english business teams in the mena region capturing meeting notes and decisions. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notah is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.